Sản xuất vẫn là động lực then chốt cho đổi mới, tăng trưởng và việc làm chất lượng cao

  • Bài viết tập hợp nhiều ý kiến phản biện lại quan điểm rằng sản xuất không còn cần thiết trong thời đại dịch vụ. Ngược lại, sản xuất vẫn là động lực then chốt cho đổi mới, tăng trưởng và việc làm chất lượng cao.

  • Tại Anh, sản xuất chiếm tỷ trọng đầu tư R&D doanh nghiệp cao nhất, có tốc độ tăng năng suất đứng thứ hai từ 2000–2023 (3%/năm), và tạo ra hệ sinh thái việc làm liên kết như thiết kế, kỹ thuật và dịch vụ.

  • Trung Quốc đang đẩy mạnh sản xuất công nghệ cao trong chiến lược “phát triển chất lượng cao”. Tăng trưởng chậm là do kinh tế toàn cầu yếu và chuyển giai đoạn, không phải lỗi của sản xuất.

  • Việc lấy Ấn Độ làm ví dụ phát triển mà không cần sản xuất bị coi là ngụy biện; ngay cả cựu Thủ tướng Manmohan Singh cũng nhấn mạnh cần nền tảng sản xuất để hấp thụ lực lượng lao động.

  • Trong bối cảnh địa chính trị hiện nay, năng lực sản xuất nội địa trở nên sống còn: Ví dụ Ukraine, sau 18 tháng khẩn cấp, EU và Mỹ chỉ sản xuất được khoảng 1 triệu đạn pháo/năm, trong khi Nga sản xuất được 4–5 triệu.

  • OECD ghi nhận năng suất đa yếu tố của ngành sản xuất tăng gấp đôi so với dịch vụ ở G7, cho thấy dịch chuyển sang nền kinh tế dịch vụ không thực sự hiệu quả như tưởng.

  • Chính sách nên thiên về chiến lược công nghiệp mở, hỗ trợ lĩnh vực then chốt như bán dẫn, năng lượng sạch thông qua quy hoạch linh hoạt, đồng đầu tư công-tư và thương mại với các quốc gia đồng minh.

  • Sản xuất trong lĩnh vực không gian, năng lượng, quốc phòng không chỉ là công cụ kinh tế mà còn mang tính chiến lược và chủ quyền quốc gia.

  • Ý kiến về “inverted commas” (dấu ngoặc kép) cho thấy sự thay đổi trong văn hóa viết – từ bị loại bỏ trong văn học tới việc phục hồi giá trị trong truyền thông chính thống để bảo vệ tính chính xác.


📌 Các chuyên gia khẳng định sản xuất vẫn là động lực sống còn cho đổi mới, tăng trưởng, quốc phòng và an ninh chuỗi cung ứng. Tại Anh, năng suất sản xuất tăng 3%/năm (2000–2023), trong khi Trung Quốc coi sản xuất công nghệ cao là cốt lõi phát triển. OECD ghi nhận năng suất ngành sản xuất G7 gấp đôi ngành dịch vụ. Các quốc gia nên đầu tư chiến lược, không từ bỏ sản xuất như một "ảo tưởng hậu công nghiệp".

https://www.economist.com/letters/2025/07/03/manufacturing-remains-a-core-driver-of-economic-growth

Manufacturing remains a core driver of economic growth

Also this week, illegal drugs, “Jaws”, social media and Christianity, inverted commas

 
|8 min read
Letters are welcome via e-mail to [email protected]
Find out more about how we process your letter

Making things is important

The world must escape “The manufacturing delusion” (June 14th), you say. Yet manufacturing remains a core driver of economic growth and high-quality jobs. Yes, manufacturing is becoming more automated, but this transformation has not diminished its importance. On the contrary, modern manufacturing drives productivity, innovation, exports and the development of complex supply chains. Factory jobs also tend to be higher value, supporting surrounding ecosystems through design, engineering and services. In Britain a lost manufacturing job often means the loss of a high-wage job outside London. Manufacturing in Britain accounts for the largest share of business R&D investment, boasts the second-fastest productivity growth among industries (3% a year from 2000–23), and remains a leading contributor to capital formation.
It is also a logical flaw to suggest that China’s growth slowdown comes from an over-reliance on manufacturing. The real factors behind its slower growth are a weaker global economy and China’s transition to a more mature development stage. In fact, China’s economic strategy is increasingly centred on spurring “new quality productive forces” through advanced manufacturing, precisely because manufacturing remains vital to innovation and long-term growth. Rather than retreating from manufacturing, China is doubling down on it as the cornerstone of its “high-quality development” agenda.
Showcasing India as an example of where economies can thrive while sidestepping manufacturing is an exercise in cherry-picking that contradicts the lessons of every other industrialised economy. Indian leaders themselves are more cautious. Manmohan Singh, the late former prime minister, noted that “A substantial manufacturing base is essential to absorb the workforce and ensure sustainable growth.”
Deindustrialisation is not a strategy, it is a surrender.
Dr Mateus Labrunie
Dr Carlos Lopez-Gomez
Professor Tim Minshall
Institute for Manufacturing
University of Cambridge
You see the retreat of industry in rich economies as a benign, inevitable drift toward services. On the ground it looks rather less idyllic. The real delusion is the belief that advanced societies can live off spreadsheets while their physical base erodes. Service innovation is welcome, but someone still has to pour the concrete and draw the wire. Better to recognise that reality now than relearn it in a hot war or a cold winter. Take Ukraine, for example. Western governments discovered that “just-in-time” re-armament is a mirage. After 18 months of emergency spending the European Union and the United States can finally muster roughly 1m 155mm shells a year. Russian factories were on course for 4-5m in 2024. If that is “remarkably fast” adaptation, one shudders to imagine slow.
Moreover, the notion that manufacturing is now a laggard is out of date. The OECD’s compendium of productivity indicators for 2023 shows manufacturing multifactor-productivity still advancing roughly twice as quickly as market services in the median G7 economy. Deindustrial economies are not more efficient. They are merely importing other people’s efficiency and exporting their own purchasing power.
The lesson is not to seal borders behind tariff walls—Donald Trump’s metals duties in 2018 proved how self-harming that can be—but to run an active, open industrial strategy. Permit planning that allows large plants to be built in years, not decades; use public co-investment where spill-overs are obvious, such as power semiconductors; use trade among allies so that capacity is pooled rather than duplicated.
Dr Wladimir Kraus
London
Manufacturing is not just about jobs, it is a crucial engine for innovation, especially in high-tech sectors. For instance, in space and aeronautics the success of programmes such as Artemis or Ariane hinges on robust, homegrown manufacturing capabilities. Similarly, the energy transition requires the ability to manufacture wind turbines and grid infrastructure domestically to avoid supply-chain disruptions. The pandemic and recent geopolitical tensions have shown that an over-reliance on foreign manufacturing can jeopardise national interests. Countries need to invest in domestic production lines for defence, satellites, and clean-energy hardware to ensure readiness and resilience.
I agree that blanket subsidies are not the answer, but targeted support for these strategic sectors, such as through workforce development, incentives for critical component production, and public-private collaboration, can help maintain a competitive edge without resorting to protectionism.
Adrian Garcia Aranyos
President
Thune Eureka
Vilagarcia, Spain

Target the demand for drugs

Strengthening anti-drug law enforcement in Ecuador is good advice (“Busting gangs, keeping the law”, June 14th). But the suggestion that legalising drugs (which you admit won’t happen) would weaken drug gangs is a fool’s errand. This is seen in America, which has in effect legalised cannabis over three decades. The legal cannabis industry has not ended illegal cannabis supply in California. Only 40% of the cannabis bought in California comes from legal suppliers and legal sellers urgently call for more law enforcement to curb their vigorous illegal competitors. The best way to weaken drug gangs is to reduce the demand for drugs. As long as people are willing to pay for drugs, drug-trafficking organisations will continue to thrive and supply them.
Dr Robert DuPont
Former White House drug czar
Chevy Chase, Maryland

Tell them I’m going fishing

I was a photographer at the Houston Chronicle when “Jaws” opened in 1975 (Back Story, June 14th). There were often long lines at the movie theatres, so long that I was assigned to take a picture of them. At one theatre in the Galleria shopping centre the line extended some 400 feet (120 metres). As a testimony to the movie’s popularity, one of those patiently waiting to buy a ticket was a man with a white cane.
Bill Clough
Victoria, Texas

 

Muscular Christianity

You identified covid-19 as a catalyst for renewed faith among Generation Z (“Not losing my religion”, June 14th). Another crucial factor is social media’s role in normalising Christianity for the young. TikTok and Instagram have become unexpected evangelising platforms, where fitness influencers and “bro-coded” content creators increasingly weave Christian messaging into their posts. These figures, often young and athletic men, present faith as compatible with modern masculinity, countering traditional perceptions of Christianity as feminine or outdated. This digital evangelism helps explain why young men are becoming “particularly keen on God”. Algorithms amplify religious content to users who show interest in self-improvement, mental health, or community. Social platforms have transformed religious discourse from institutional to personal, from formal to accessible.
Chase Schaub
Boston

“Baptism boom” (May 31st) reported on the rise of adult baptisms in France. I noted your suggestion that covid-19 may be one explanation for this trend, and that “an excessive time spent on screens and working from home” may be another. In America an article written by Alec Tyson, Michael Lipka and Claudia Deane in February this year for the Pew Research Centre offers an extensive insight into how the pandemic affected religious life in this country.
As an educator I can honestly say that post-covid-19 students are less engaged and more withdrawn. The question remains to be seen whether they can play catch-up on their human capital, or will the pandemic forever be their Achilles’ heel?
Edward Lamb
Texarkana, Texas

Talking punctuation

Inverted commas to indicate dialogue in writing are falling out of fashion, you report (“Inverted snobbery”, June 14th). Samuel Beckett’s trilogy in the early 1950s ignored inverted commas altogether. Beckett’s hostility to the conventional novel was almost certainly behind his decision. The effect is a unity with the narrator, but which may not work well, or even clearly, with other styles of writing. James Joyce dropped inverted commas in “Ulysses”, but this was published under different circumstances. He was subject to French printers whose conventions determined the result, and in the bargain, they made errors in the text.
Guy Cranswick
Sydney
When Joyce wrote a passage of “Ulysses” without any punctuation he was praised as a literary hero. When I wrote an essay without any punctuation all I got was “1/10, See Me”. Joyce’s pernicious influence on writing needs to be expunged, so that we can rightfully consign to the dustbin the most ludicrously overrated author in the English language.
Robert Frazer
Salford
Inverted commas may be creatures of fashion but from our furry ancestors onwards, vocal speech between real people has been augmented by gestures. Think of those punctuation marks as signals from author to reader and their importance becomes clearer.
Unlike the novels cited, when it comes to the encyclopedias of knowledge on which we rely for our understanding of the world, these quotation marks retain their central place in distinguishing between the view of the author and that of someone being cited. In a world where truth is at risk, careful use of the old inverted comma will continue to have its place.
Peter Tompkins
Vice-chairman
King’s English Society
London
It was with what I now take to be the predictable horror of the over-educated that I read your piece on the decline of the inverted comma. Yet something intrigues me. How do we explain the inverse correlation between said decline and the inexorable rise in people using the “air quotes” gesture in conversation, a polite two-fingered movement that incarnates the textual symbol. If you are right, presumably, and perhaps ironically, our ancestors will one day wonder quite where that gesture came from in the first place.
Tim Bale
Professor of politics
Queen Mary University of London
You say that quotation marks are “inaudible and unpronounceable”. Not so. The great Victor Borge resolved that issue with his invention of phonetic punctuation. Readers will have to search out his actual presentation to get the full flavour, but suffice it to say that inverted commas can easily be indicated with a kind of double-clicking sound (upward inflected to open and downward to close, of course).
Jack Stevens
Brookline, Massachusetts
The most accurate term for inverted commas isn’t perverted commas by James Joyce but rather (“)air bunnies(”) by Gloria Delgado-Pritchett in “Modern Family”.
Michael Rurik Halaby
London
FORGETINVERTEDCOMMASWESHOULDRETURNTOTHEANCIENTGREEKWAYSANDWRITEINALLCAPITALLETTERSWITHNOPUNCTUATIONWHATSOEVER
David Opderbeck
Professor
Seton Hall University School of Law
Newark, New Jersey
 
 

Không có file đính kèm.

24

Thảo luận

© Sóng AI - Tóm tắt tin, bài trí tuệ nhân tạo